To many environmentalists, the slipping
of Indonesia in the 2012 Global Risk Index by three places, announced
this week, has come as no surprise given the wanton disregard for the
land, rivers and seas that we witness by just opening our eyes. The
Global Risk Index 2012 covers the period 1991 to 2010 and takes real
data to analyze what has happened and where. It uses this to detail an
occurrence map and to highlight trends. The index also takes into
account current events in terms of deforestation, reef destruction and
mangrove depletion, for example to predict how severe the impact of
changing weather patterns and rising sea levels will be.
With global satellite mapping now
available, the destructive information no longer relies on
self-interest-based government statistics. It is quite revealing. From
the index, the nations most at risk are mostly developing nations; but,
as we saw with Hurricane Katrina in 2005, climate change and the growing
severity of events pose global risks to life and property. Some
countries, such as Bangladesh and India, have a major geographical
disadvantage, but others, such as Indonesia, China and Taiwan, are
contributing negatively to their own future security. This trend can be
slowed and even reversed with government commitment to prevent man-made
marine and coastal destruction.
The Cancun Protocol (COP 16) has made
funds available for mitigation and disaster relief work, in other words
government inactivity should not be excused because of lack of capital.
For good projects, money is available, and this has a triple benefit in
places such as Bali. Projects that preserve the coast or reefs can
create quality employment and also help in portraying a positive
international image, as well as actually saving areas from destruction.
There are three main factors why risk in Indonesia has increased: reef
destruction, mangrove depletion and population increase. The growth in
global population has forced ever more people to live on the edge, thus
exposing them to increasing dangers, and globally over 1 million people
have died in the period covered as a result of storms or other
catastrophes.
The reefs and mangroves are life-giving
phenomena, they provide a rich source of food, beauty and promote
diversity, but they also absorb the ocean’s power. In a tropical storm a
reef can reduce the energy making landfall by up to 85 percent. You can
compare southern Kuta beaches or Sanur to Canggu beaches at normal high
tides for a graphic illustration. The Nature Conservancy Indonesia’s
marine program director, Abdul Halim, responded to this report saying:
“Southeast Asia, and in particular Indonesia, has by far the greatest
number of people in low elevation areas and its reefs are the most
threatened.
We must strive to inspire government and
local stakeholders for higher engagement in marine conservation and
sustainable use of resources.” There has been no official government
response to date. With regard to future climate change, the index serves
as a warning indicating past vulnerability, which will further increase
in regions where extreme weather and disasters associated with that are
becoming more frequent and severe. In simple terms, it is a legitimate
tool for understanding our own risk and where we sit in relation to
other nations. Our slipping by three places is largely down to our own
destructive actions, and, as the climate continues to change, the very
things that protect us become ever more ineffective. Indonesia has 35
million people who are classified as “at risk”, and in terms of an
extreme event and the associated loss of life, it is no longer a case of
IF, but a case of WHEN.
source : bali daily
0 comments:
Post a Comment